You all by yourself couldn't install an exterior door on your home for $100 ,now tell me who's fault that cost change is & who bears the cost of the correct doors , either the building owner because his architect supplied wrong specs or the door company's estimator & his company eats the cost , in neither case is it the fault of workmen .This is why you shouldn't use Google to argue with cause I'm gonna discredit every thing you posted for the nonsense it is .
Again your reading then regurgitating political nonsense mixed in with fact to fit your agenda & its reinforcing my position
Who's fault are the design changes structural changes & equipment change orders ! If your stumped reread my previous post to you .
Hint comprehensive reading of my post you quoted will answer all your confused examples trying to lay the blame at hourly workers feet .
As I already painstakingly pointed out any changes in plans, design or structure are the fault of the architect, the changes in equipment are caused by hospital administration , both cases have zero to do with any hourly worker on site or his company , these stupid examples your giving are only proving my point .
Oh & the equipment wouldn't fit thru the doors because the architect altered the room designs ,as you pointed out ,which most likely attributed to equipment not fitting , next you have hospital admins changing equipment where they didn't consult the architect , or the architect was negligent with his alterations to original plans causing equipment not to fit .
So far every example you have gave is proving my assertation that all additional costs are caused by the architect changing the structure ( as I already told you ) or by the bldg owner requesting extras , in this case different equipment that don't fit ( I told you this already also ) .
Your not doing so well supporting your position that hourly workers are the cause of cost over runs & Google is making it worse on ya
Oh and on your rebar example, how the hell do you equate that to any hourly worker , the contractor is responsible for ordering the correct material for the hourly workers to install , not hourly workers , another nonsense example fully discredited
.
One more thing about your bldgs rebar & the contractor being paid in full , if the contractor couldn't aquire the specified material architects always have approved secondary materials in their specifications , the rebar had to be an approved alternate material or the contractor would a never received his final job draw which is normally 20% , if the contractor got paid in full & saved $500,000 by using an alternate approved rebar then good for him ,his estimator should get a fat bonus .
The more shit you Google spew the more obvious it becomes how clueless you are about construction ,architects & specifications , every last material on the job has an approved alternate , sometimes several alternate materials, that includes things as important as rebar all the way down to the caulking used on the exterior of the building which is always Vulkem that costs $12 a tube , its approved alternate is Sika Flex 1A that costs $ 4 a tube , a savy estimator will use the $4 caulking & not violate his terms of contract , same as your rebar example .
So far all you have done is to reinforce my 1st hand experience assertion that cost over runs always come from the architect changing the design , or the bldg owner asking for something new .
You will not win this one with Google red , I already know all the answers without Google